117

I have several failing tests that only output [object ErrorEvent] thrown. I don't see anything in the console that helps me pinpoint the offending code. Is there something I need to do to track these down?

[EDIT]: I'm running Karma v1.70, Jasmine v2.7.0

angularrocks.com
  • 26,767
  • 13
  • 87
  • 104
Darrell Brogdon
  • 6,843
  • 9
  • 47
  • 62
  • Can you include more of the error? Like multiple lines of the error before and after? – Kevin Aug 16 '17 at 20:29
  • 4
    `[object ErrorEvent] thrown` is literally all it says. There is nothing before or after. – Darrell Brogdon Aug 16 '17 at 20:42
  • 1
    As luck would have it, I just got this issue literally the same time you were posting this question, it turned out to be a "rogue" script tag (it could also be css link) which needed to be removed (my issue was related to CORS), or in case of css, I just added crossorigin="anonymous". Check your code for such script/css tags, in my case I found the issue to be caused by a totally different component! – TheDude Aug 18 '17 at 19:04
  • are you on angular cli aren't you? @DarrellBrogdon – angularrocks.com Oct 23 '17 at 04:22
  • 1
    @TheDude How did you narrow down this script? Line by line? Or was there some debug process that helped you narrow down where it was? I'm having the same issue and the only info I have to go on is the message: An error was thrown in afterAll. If I isolate the test itself by changing `it()` to `fit()`, even though only that single test is running, the error is still being thrown. Any debug recommendations for this type of error? – Knight Aug 16 '18 at 19:19
  • Have you tried importing HttpClientTestingModule to your unit test? That's what worked for my case. – Derek K Aug 04 '20 at 03:19

17 Answers17

126

FYI: you can find the exact error thrown just by open DevTools Console once your tests are running.

As a quickfix you can try to run your tests without sourcemaps:

CLI v6.0.8 and above
--source-map=false

CLI v6.0.x early versions
--sourceMap=false

CLI v1.x
--sourcemaps=false

Shortcut ng test -sm=false might also work

There is an open issue on that https://github.com/angular/angular-cli/issues/7296

UPDATE: I had that issue as well, so I just migrated to the latest cli and make sure that all packages are updated in package.json also I fully reinstalled the node_modules so now the issue has gone.

angularrocks.com
  • 26,767
  • 13
  • 87
  • 104
53

If sourcemap=false doesn't help, try to 1) open your browser running the tests 2) click debug button 3) open the console

The error will be there

enter image description here

Victor Bredihin
  • 2,220
  • 21
  • 30
  • 8
    I didn't even need to click the debug button. Just opening developer console worked for me. – chris31389 Aug 21 '18 at 08:18
  • Brilliant! I added the sourcemap option everywhere, but in the end this gave me the info I needed – SkarXa Sep 27 '18 at 13:20
  • 1
    The `--sourcemaps=false` thing wasn't working for me, but this worked flawlessly! Thank you! – mrClean May 09 '19 at 13:16
  • Doesn't really help if the browser closes right after the test. Guess I'll write a bunch of useless tests to keep the window open, like some kind of caveman. – CoryCoolguy May 20 '20 at 00:23
24

Try if you get a more descriptive error message by running the test from the terminal, like this:

ng test -sm=false

In your test, you can replace

it('should...')

with

fit('should...') 

Now only tests preceded by fit will run. To leave the browser open after running the test, run the test like this:

ng test -sm=false --single-run false

Personally, I have encountered this error twice. Both were only triggered when calling fixture.detectChanges().

The first time, I solved it by using string interpolation more safely in my .html file.

Unsafe example:

<p>{{user.firstName}}</p>

Safe(r) example (note the question mark):

<p>{{user?.firstName}}</p>

The same may apply to property binding:

<p [innerText]="user?.firstName"></p>

The second time, I was using a DatePipe in my .html file, but the mock property that I used it on was not a date.

.html file:

<p>{{startDate | date: 'dd-MM-yyyy'}}</p>

.ts (mock-data) file (wrong):

let startDate = 'blablah';

.ts (mock-data) file (correct):

let startDate = '2018-01-26';
harryvederci
  • 489
  • 4
  • 7
18

This is because the jasmine framework can not handle the ErrorEvent type so it does not extract the error message and calls error.toString() on that object instead.

I just filed an issue at jasmine repo https://github.com/jasmine/jasmine/issues/1594

As long as it is not fixed, you can temporarily patch your installed jasmine package in the node_modules folder. In my case it is

node_modules/jasmine/node_modules/lib/jasmine-core/jasmine.js

and then change the implementation of the ExceptionFormatter from this

if (error.name && error.message) {
    message += error.name + ': ' + error.message;
} else {
    message += error.toString() + ' thrown';
}

to this

if (error.name && error.message) {
    message += error.name + ': ' + error.message;
} else if (error.message) {
    message += error.message;
} else {
    message += error.toString() + ' thrown';
}

It helps to identify the issue.

Ginie
  • 433
  • 5
  • 6
  • 3
    This worked for me in jasmine-core@2.99.1. However, I had to patch it in `node_modules/jasmine_core/lib/jasmine_core/jasmine.js` – Roger Garza Jan 24 '19 at 16:04
  • So good - took a minute to find this post but it saved my butt. Thanks. Same jasmine-core version – mr rogers Jan 31 '19 at 01:21
  • After changing this, it only printed `uncaught` for me which wasn't helpful. So I added code to print `error` object and its properties. `if(error){ // message+=error; for(var propName in error) { propValue = error[propName] message+='error prop: '+propName+', value: '+propValue; } } `. This provided extra info which helped me in debugging - eg`error prop: filename, value: blob:http://localhost:9881/11777e3a-28d8-414e-9047-cee7d328e843` – Manu Chadha May 12 '20 at 21:50
7

For me it was related to having a promise resolved in the ngOnInit of a component. I had to use async, fakeAsync and tick as well as stubbing out the async service with spyOn

beforeEach(async(
  //... initialise testbed and component
))
beforeEach(fakeAsync(
  // ... setup mocks then call:
  component.ngOnInit()
  tick()
  fixture.detectChanges()
))

Angular - How to unit test component with asynchronous service call

actual_kangaroo
  • 5,971
  • 2
  • 31
  • 45
4

TL;DR: It may be related to testing routing.

I'm getting [object ErrorEvent] thrown too. An hour later, traced it to one line of code.

this.username = this.userService.getUser(this.route.snapshot.paramMap.get('id'))[0];

The problem lies with the test environment attempting to evaluate this.route.snapshot.paramMap.get('id').

If I replace it with 0, [object ErrorEvent] thrown goes away.

My userService has a user like so:

public users = [ ["admin", "First name", "Surname", etc... ] ].

So 0 just gets this user, at index 0.

Otherwise when normally running my app, this.route.snapshot.paramMap.get('id') is evaluated when the user selects a user to edit from my table of users.

So in my HTML, *ngFor="let user of users; index as i" loops to display all the users then routerLink="/edit/{{i}}" so you can click on edit buttons for each user, which when clicked go to e.g. http://localhost:4200/edit/0 to edit the aforementioned admin user's details.

Leo
  • 10,407
  • 3
  • 45
  • 62
4

what about cleaning after each test case:

  afterEach(() => {
    TestBed.resetTestingModule();
  })
3

For me, this was caused by not defining an error handler for an api I was subscribed to.

My fix just involved adding the block of code to handle (err) below:

it('reports an error to subscribers of api calls if not authenticated', (done) => {
    let obsDataFound = dataService.find(1);
    obsDataFound.subscribe((app) => {
        // not expecting this block to be called
        done();
    }, (err) => {
        // This is the err block that I added that solved the problem
        expect(true).toBeTruthy();
        done();
    });

    let testRequest = httpMock.expectOne({method: 'GET'});
    const mockErrorResponse = { status: 401, statusText: 'Unauthorized test status message' };
    testRequest.flush(appTest, mockErrorResponse);
});
Adam Wise
  • 2,043
  • 20
  • 17
1

I had the same problem. One way this error happens is when you try to access anything null or undefined in template. Make sure you have safety checking on those variable.

For example this will throw [object: ErrorEvent] when config is undefined on component load.

template.html

<div *ngIf="config.options">
   .....
   ......
</div>

Do this instead

<div *ngIf="config?.options">
   .....
   ......
</div>
kashpatel
  • 696
  • 1
  • 6
  • 18
1

What can help is, if you have the Chrome window open for your Karma test runner, to open the developer tools and check the console there. For me, this helped me to find out that the app could not use the Array.findIndex method on an undefined array (because the data structure was organized by a date string, such as data[2018][3][28], and I happened to be pointing to the wrong date), but yet instead of just stopping at the error, the test kept running.

OzzyTheGiant
  • 711
  • 8
  • 21
0

You may have a race or an async test that isn't set up quite right or is used incorrectly. I would assume that the debug case needs to be fixed and ignore that the command line passes. Just keep refreshing the karma test runner (browser) in case the error [object ErrorEvent] thrown appears intermittently, then make sure you have implemented the async condition correctly.

Hopefully this works.

0

For me the issue was that I had a test where I was accidentally using the auth0-lock library.

Manolis
  • 893
  • 1
  • 14
  • 33
0

It appeared to be an async problem, because after I added enough its in one of my component specs, I was able to get a usable error message which pointed to a file and line within that file (it was related to paramMap.

In the spec that tested ParamMap, I just added:

  describe('this test', () => {
    it('will succeed', () => {
      expect(true).toBeTruthy();
    });

    it('will succeed', () => {
      expect(true).toBeTruthy();
    });

    it('will succeed', () => {
      expect(true).toBeTruthy();
    });

    it('will succeed', () => {
      expect(true).toBeTruthy();
    });
  });
inorganik
  • 24,255
  • 17
  • 90
  • 114
0

[object ErrorEvent] thrown

This error shows that you have something undefined. The easiest way to debug it from my experience is :

it('should create', () => {
    console.log(component);
    // You can check in the browser log which property is undefined
    });
AS Mackay
  • 2,831
  • 9
  • 19
  • 25
  • This has actually turned out to be the most useful reminder of all: in my tests I have a mock authentication service, that missed a method. Seemingly unrelated, one of the tests in a component failed, but not when isolated. I have tracked the obscure `[object ErrorEvent] thrown` down to that remote missing method only thanks to the console.log :) – RedDree Dec 18 '18 at 09:40
0

In my case the problem was with the service, as one of the object wil be undefined during tests running.

Service code sample was something like below access to dom,

  const elem = this.document.querySelector(element) as HTMLElement;
  elem.scrollIntoView({param1: ''});

The specs referring to this service were failing with the error '[object ErrorEvent] thrown'.

I mocked my service object inside all the specs which were referring to this and the issue got resolved.

Mock service

class MockService {
serviceMethod(div) : void {
  testElement = document.querySelector('div') as HTMLElement;
  return testElement;
  } 
}

And use this mock service object in providers as below,

beforeEach(async(() => {

TestBed.configureTestingModule({
  declarations: [Component],
  providers: [
     { provide: Service, useClass: MockService },
    ],
})
  .compileComponents();
}));
Vishwa G
  • 573
  • 1
  • 6
  • 13
0

I was using a proxy in my application defined in proxy.conf.json like:

'/api': { 'target': 'some path', 'changeOrigin': false }

Because Karma wasn't aware of this proxy, it kept trowing errors in the console that the API endpoint could not be found. So after looking in the Karma documentation, I found out that what I could do was to add the "proxies" property in karma.conf.js with the same object from the proxy.conf.json:

proxies: { '/api': { 'target': 'some path', 'changeOrigin': false }}

The error in the console was gone, and the [object errorEvent] was no longer thrown.

Arnold Layne
  • 194
  • 1
  • 11
-1

In the end, what can worked for me:

    TestBed.resetTestingModule();
  })