4207

How do I easily undo a git rebase? A lengthy manual method is:

  1. checkout the commit parent to both of the branches
  2. create and checkout a temporary branch
  3. cherry-pick all commits by hand
  4. reset the faulty rebased branch to point to the temporary branch

In my current situation, this works because I can easily spot commits from both branches (one was my stuff, the other was my colleague's stuff). However, my approach strikes me as suboptimal and error-prone (let's say I had just rebased with two of my own branches).

Clarification: I am talking about a rebase during which multiple commits were replayed, not only one.

Mateen Ulhaq
  • 24,552
  • 19
  • 101
  • 135
webmat
  • 58,466
  • 12
  • 54
  • 59
  • **`commit:`** is what your looking after the HEAD@{#} to reset to. Not `rebase:`, `reset:`, `merge:` or `checkout:`. – cachius Mar 15 '23 at 09:35

19 Answers19

5797

The easiest way would be to find the head commit of the branch as it was immediately before the rebase started in the reflog...

git reflog

and to reset the current branch to it (with the usual caveats about being absolutely sure before reseting with the --hard option).

Suppose the old commit was HEAD@{2} in the ref log:

git reset --hard HEAD@{2}

In Windows, you may need to quote the reference:

git reset --hard "HEAD@{2}"

You can check the history of the candidate old head by just doing a git log HEAD@{2} (Windows: git log "HEAD@{2}").

If you've not disabled per branch reflogs you should be able to simply do git reflog branchname@{1} as a rebase detaches the branch head before reattaching to the final head. I would double-check this behavior, though, as I haven't verified it recently.

Per default, all reflogs are activated for non-bare repositories:

[core]
    logAllRefUpdates = true
Community
  • 1
  • 1
CB Bailey
  • 755,051
  • 104
  • 632
  • 656
  • 203
    Git reflog is awesome, just remember you can get better formatted output with `git log -g` (tip from Scott Chacon's http://progit.org/book). – karmi Jul 23 '10 at 10:14
  • 3
    Per Allan's answer below a `git rebase -i --abort` is needed as well. The above alone is not enough. – Hazok Jun 14 '11 at 22:36
  • 88
    @Zach: `git rebase --abort` (`-i` makes no sense with `--abort`) is for abandoning a rebase that hasn't been completed - either because there were conflicts or because it was interactive or both; it's not about undoing a successful rebase which is what the question is about. You would either use `rebase --abort` or `reset --hard` depending on which situation you were in. You shouldn't need to do both. – CB Bailey Jun 15 '11 at 20:40
  • 427
    Just in case, make a backup first: `git tag BACKUP`. You can return to it if something goes wrong: `git reset --hard BACKUP` – kolypto Nov 05 '12 at 14:00
  • 32
    If you've made a lot of commits the HEAD@{#} you're looking for will be prefaced with `commit:` as opposed to `rebase:`. Sounds obvious but it confused me for a bit. – Warpling Aug 26 '13 at 20:43
1980

Actually, rebase saves your starting point to ORIG_HEAD so this is usually as simple as:

git reset --hard ORIG_HEAD

However, the reset, rebase and merge all save your original HEAD pointer into ORIG_HEAD so, if you've done any of those commands since the rebase you're trying to undo then you'll have to use the reflog.

Pat Notz
  • 208,672
  • 30
  • 90
  • 92
  • 52
    In case `ORIG_HEAD` is no longer useful, you can also use the `branchName@{n}` syntax, where `n` is the nth prior position of the branch pointer. So for example, if you rebase `featureA` branch onto your `master` branch, but you don't like the result of the rebase, then you can simply do `git reset --hard featureA@{1}` to reset the branch back to exactly where it was before you did the rebase. You can read more about the branch@{n} syntax at [the official Git docs for revisions](http://git-scm.com/docs/gitrevisions). –  May 24 '13 at 05:17
  • 21
    This is the easiest. Follow it up with a `git rebase --abort` though. – Seph Sep 16 '15 at 19:24
  • 13
    @Seph Can you explain why you suggest following up with `git rebase --abort`? – UpTheCreek Jan 28 '19 at 08:50
  • @Seph I agree with UpTheCreek as in my case it was not necessary. Maybe it is needed when things get odd during an interactive rebase? I would suggest anyone to try a `git status` to see if it mentions about the rebase or not first. Anyway doing a `git rebase --abort` should be harmless. If there is no ongoing rebase it will just fail complaining "`fatal: No rebase in progress?`". – Jacopo Tedeschi Aug 20 '21 at 14:44
  • This did not help me (just in my case), I got back by two commits to an older one, though I needed the newer two commits. The accepted answer with taking the right line from reflog made it. – questionto42 Apr 19 '22 at 14:38
  • 4
    Is it possible to check what the commit of ORIG_HEAD is first? – Simon May 09 '22 at 12:13
  • 1
    @Simon yep ORIG_HEAD is just a file `.git/ORIG_HEAD` containing the commit. – Arkade Jun 15 '23 at 13:03
520

Charles's answer works, but you may want to do this:

git rebase --abort

to clean up after the reset.

Otherwise, you may get the message “Interactive rebase already started”.

Borislav Ivanov
  • 4,684
  • 3
  • 31
  • 55
Allan
  • 5,594
  • 1
  • 16
  • 3
  • 178
    That was not the question. The question asks how to undo a finished rebase. – Arunav Sanyal Apr 04 '17 at 18:29
  • 6
    While it may not be the answer, this info is essential and the answer doesn't have it. After using `reflog` and `reset --hard`, you still may need to abort the rebase to get back to good. – mattmc3 Aug 15 '22 at 16:41
115

Resetting the branch to the dangling commit object of its old tip is of course the best solution, because it restores the previous state without expending any effort. But if you happen to have lost those commits (f.ex. because you garbage-collected your repository in the meantime, or this is a fresh clone), you can always rebase the branch again. The key to this is the --onto switch.

Let’s say you had a topic branch imaginatively called topic, that you branched off master when the tip of master was the 0deadbeef commit. At some point while on the topic branch, you did git rebase master. Now you want to undo this. Here’s how:

git rebase --onto 0deadbeef master topic

This will take all commits on topic that aren’t on master and replay them on top of 0deadbeef.

With --onto, you can rearrange your history into pretty much any shape whatsoever.

Have fun. :-)

Aristotle Pagaltzis
  • 112,955
  • 23
  • 98
  • 97
  • 3
    I think this is the best option because of its flexibility. I branched b1 off master, then rebased b1 into a new branch b2, then wanted to revert b1 to be based on master again. I just love git - thanks! – ripper234 Aug 17 '11 at 12:59
  • 2
    This is the best option here! It kept all changes I have on my current branch, and removed all the unwanted ones! – Alicia Tang Mar 15 '16 at 20:43
  • for some reason your answer made me realize I can do a git rebase -i commitish and then EDIT the commit I wasn't satisfied with :) – Devin Rhode Oct 18 '20 at 04:10
109

In case you had pushed your branch to remote repository (usually it's origin) and then you've done a succesfull rebase (without merge) (git rebase --abort gives "No rebase in progress") you can easily reset branch using command:

git reset --hard origin/{branchName}

Example:

$ ~/work/projects/{ProjectName} $ git status
On branch {branchName}
Your branch is ahead of 'origin/{branchName}' by 135 commits.
  (use "git push" to publish your local commits)

nothing to commit, working directory clean

$ ~/work/projects/{ProjectName} $ git reset --hard origin/{branchName}
HEAD is now at 6df5719 "Commit message".

$ ~/work/projects/{ProjectName} $ git status
On branch {branchName}
Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/{branchName}.

nothing to commit, working directory clean
Nick Roz
  • 3,918
  • 2
  • 36
  • 57
Maksym
  • 4,434
  • 4
  • 27
  • 46
98
git reset --hard origin/{branchName}

is the correct solution to reset all your local changes done by rebase.

Tiago Martins Peres
  • 14,289
  • 18
  • 86
  • 145
Damodar P
  • 1,283
  • 8
  • 3
  • 5
    This is a very clean solution. Thank you for posting. I always push to remote before doing a rebase and this post saved my bacon, as I was ~3 days out of date w/ master on a big project. Thank you :) – Adrian Aug 03 '21 at 02:23
  • 8
    This can cause problems if there are local commits that weren't pushed. Be warned – Onewildgamer Feb 14 '22 at 04:41
78

I actually put a backup tag on the branch before I do any nontrivial operation (most rebases are trivial, but I'd do that if it looks anywhere complex).

Then, restoring is as easy as git reset --hard BACKUP.

Alex Gontmakher
  • 1,367
  • 11
  • 10
  • 14
    You actually don't even need to make a backup branch, you can simply use the `branchName@{n}` syntax, here `n` is the nth prior position of the branch pointer. So for example, if you rebase `featureA` branch onto your `master` branch, but you don't like the result of the rebase, then you can simply do `git reset --hard featureA@{1}` to reset the branch back to exactly where it was before you did the rebase. You can read more about the `branch@{n}` syntax at [the official Git docs for revisions](http://git-scm.com/docs/gitrevisions). –  May 24 '13 at 05:12
37

Using reflog didn't work for me.

What worked for me was similar to as described here. Open the file in .git/logs/refs named after the branch that was rebased and find the line that contains "rebase finsihed", something like:

5fce6b51 88552c8f Kris Leech <me@example.com> 1329744625 +0000  rebase finished: refs/heads/integrate onto 9e460878

Checkout the second commit listed on the line.

git checkout 88552c8f

Once confirmed this contained my lost changes I branched and let out a sigh of relief.

git log
git checkout -b lost_changes
Kris
  • 19,188
  • 9
  • 91
  • 111
  • 2
    Thanks man, you saved my life. For me I had `rebase (finish):` followed by 3 commit IDs. The second ID was the correct one. – PatPatchPatrick Jan 04 '22 at 22:50
  • Mine listed 2 commit id's, and said `rebase (finish)`. Since I wanted the commit BEFORE I rebased, I used the *2nd* commit id on the line PRIOR to the rebase (=== the **1st** commit id on the line WITH the rebase command). Then I used the command `git reset --hard `. Viola! Restored as if I never performed the rebase. The commit IDs seem to be in the format of *idBeforeCommand* *idAfterCommand* *Who* *Date/time* *Command* – SherylHohman Apr 18 '22 at 17:33
19

For multiple commits, remember that any commit references all the history leading up to that commit. So in Charles' answer, read "the old commit" as "the newest of the old commits". If you reset to that commit, then all the history leading up to that commit will reappear. This should do what you want.

Greg Hewgill
  • 951,095
  • 183
  • 1,149
  • 1,285
18

If you successfully rebased against a remote branch and can not git rebase --abort you still can do some tricks to save your work and don't have forced pushes. Suppose your current branch that was rebased by mistake is called your-branch and is tracking origin/your-branch

  • git branch -m your-branch-rebased # rename current branch
  • git checkout origin/your-branch # checkout to latest state that is known to the origin
  • git checkout -b your-branch
  • check git log your-branch-rebased, compare to git log your-branch, and define commits that are missing from your-branch
  • git cherry-pick COMMIT_HASH for every commit in your-branch-rebased
  • push your changes. Please be aware that two local branches are associated with remote/your-branch and you should push only your-branch
Vlad L.
  • 154
  • 1
  • 9
Sergey P. aka azure
  • 3,993
  • 1
  • 29
  • 23
16

If you don't want to do a hard reset...

You can checkout the commit from the reflog, and then save it as a new branch:

git reflog

Find the commit just before you started rebasing. You may need to scroll further down to find it (press Enter or PageDown). Take note of the HEAD number and replace 57:

git checkout HEAD@{57}

Review the branch/commits, and if it's correct then create a new branch using this HEAD:

git checkout -b new_branch_name
Andrew
  • 18,680
  • 13
  • 103
  • 118
13

Following the solution of @Allan and @Zearin, I wish I could simply do a comment though but I don't enough reputation, so I have used the following command:

Instead of doing git rebase -i --abort (note the -i) I had to simply do git rebase --abort (without the -i).

Using both -i and --abort at the same time causes Git to show me a list of usage/options.

So my previous and current branch status with this solution is:

matbhz@myPc /my/project/environment (branch-123|REBASE-i)
$ git rebase --abort

matbhz@myPc /my/project/environment (branch-123)
$
Matheus Felipe
  • 2,482
  • 25
  • 24
10

Another way that doesn't require doing a hard reset is to create a new branch with your desired starting point.

As with the other solutions, you use the reflog to find the correct starting point.

git reflog

(you can also use git log -g here for more detail)

Then you note the reference to the commit SHA (ex: e86a52b851e).

Finally, you use the git branch command.

git branch recover-branch e86a52b851e

Reference: https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Internals-Maintenance-and-Data-Recovery#_data_recovery

GuyStalks
  • 169
  • 1
  • 5
6

If you are on a branch you can use:

git reset --hard @{1}

There is not only a reference log for HEAD (obtained by git reflog), there are also reflogs for each branch (obtained by git reflog <branch>). So, if you are on master then git reflog master will list all changes to that branch. You can refer to that changes by master@{1}, master@{2}, etc.

git rebase will usually change HEAD multiple times but the current branch will be updated only once.

@{1} is simply a shortcut for the current branch, so it's equal to master@{1} if you are on master.

git reset --hard ORIG_HEAD will not work if you used git reset during an interactive rebase.

devconsole
  • 7,875
  • 1
  • 34
  • 42
5

Let's say I rebase master to my feature branch and I get 30 new commits which break something. I've found that often it's easiest to just remove the bad commits.

git rebase -i HEAD~31

Interactive rebase for the last 31 commits (it doesn't hurt if you pick way too many).

Simply take the commits that you want to get rid of and mark them with "d" instead of "pick". Now the commits are deleted effectively undoing the rebase (if you remove only the commits you just got when rebasing).

Hardev
  • 10,851
  • 2
  • 17
  • 17
4

What I usually do is git reset #commit_hash

to the last commit where I think rebase had no effect.

then git pull

Now your branch should match exactly like master and rebased commits should not be in it.

Now one can just cherry-pick the commits on this branch.

mrigendra
  • 1,472
  • 3
  • 19
  • 33
3

It annoys me to no end that none of these answers is fully automatic, despite the fact that it should be automatable (at least mostly). I created a set of aliases to try to remedy this:

# Useful commands
#################

# Undo the last rebase
undo-rebase = "! f() { : git reset ; PREV_COMMIT=`git x-rev-before-rebase` && git reset --merge \"$PREV_COMMIT\" \"$@\";}; f"

# See what changed since the last rebase
rdiff = "!f() { : git diff ; git diff `git x-rev-before-rebase` "$@";}; f"

# Helpers
########
# Get the revision before the last rebase started
x-rev-before-rebase = !git reflog --skip=1 -1 \"`git x-start-of-rebase`\" --format=\"%gD\"

# Get the revision that started the rebase
x-start-of-rebase = reflog --grep-reflog '^rebase (start)' -1 --format="%gD"

You should be able to tweak this to allow going back an arbitrary number of rebases pretty easily (juggling the args is the trickiest part), which can be useful if you do a number of rebases in quick succession and mess something up along the way.

Caveats

It will get confused if any commit messages begin with "rebase (start)" (please don't do this). You could make the regex more resilient to improve the situation by matching something like this for your regex:

--grep-reflog "^rebase (start): checkout " 

WARNING: not tested (regex may need adjustments)

The reason I haven't done this is because I'm not 100% that a rebase always begins with a checkout. Can anyone confirm this?

[If you're curious about the null (:) commands at the beginning of the function, that's a way of setting up bash completions for the aliases]

Tiago Martins Peres
  • 14,289
  • 18
  • 86
  • 145
DylanYoung
  • 2,423
  • 27
  • 30
1

I tried all suggestions with reset and reflog without any success. Restoring local history of IntelliJ resolved the problem of lost files

-5

If you mess something up within a git rebase, e.g. git rebase --abort, while you have uncommitted files, they will be lost and git reflog will not help. This happened to me and you will need to think outside the box here. If you are lucky like me and use IntelliJ Webstorm then you can right-click->local history and can revert to a previous state of your file/folders no matter what mistakes you have done with versioning software. It is always good to have another failsafe running.

Ed Avis
  • 1,350
  • 17
  • 36
Stephan Kristyn
  • 15,015
  • 14
  • 88
  • 147
  • 6
    `git rebase --abort` aborts an active rebase, it doesn't _undo_ a rebase. Also, using two VCS's at the same time is a bad idea. Its a nice feature in Jetbrains software but you shouldn't use both. It's better to just learn Git, particularly when answering questions on Stack Overflow that are about Git. – dudewad May 15 '17 at 17:56