3178

I have a Nginx running inside a docker container. I have a MySql running on the host system. I want to connect to the MySql from within my container. MySql is only binding to the localhost device.

Is there any way to connect to this MySql or any other program on localhost from within this docker container?

This question is different from "How to get the IP address of the docker host from inside a docker container" due to the fact that the IP address of the docker host could be the public IP or the private IP in the network which may or may not be reachable from within the docker container (I mean public IP if hosted at AWS or something). Even if you have the IP address of the docker host it does not mean you can connect to docker host from within the container given that IP address as your Docker network may be overlay, host, bridge, macvlan, none etc which restricts the reachability of that IP address.

bfontaine
  • 18,169
  • 13
  • 73
  • 107
Phil
  • 46,436
  • 33
  • 110
  • 175
  • 7
    Why not bind mysql to docker0 as well? – ivant Jun 20 '14 at 11:42
  • 3
    For Windows Machine :- $docker run -d --name MyWebServer -P httpd – Lokesh S Sep 17 '18 at 15:14
  • 30
    Without `network: host` you can't go back from a container to the host. Only host to container. This is the main ideology behind containers. They are isolated for both stability and security reasons. – FreeSoftwareServers May 17 '20 at 20:26
  • You will likely need to make sure your local server accepts connections from anywhere (ie. `0.0.0.0`) when starting it as docker containers are isolated from the local network. – Akaisteph7 Sep 01 '23 at 20:15

42 Answers42

4355

Edit:

If you are using Docker-for-mac or Docker-for-Windows 18.03+, connect to your mysql service using the host host.docker.internal (instead of the 127.0.0.1 in your connection string).

If you are using Docker-for-Linux 20.10.0+, you can also use the host host.docker.internal if you started your Docker container with the --add-host host.docker.internal:host-gateway option, or added the following snippet in your docker-compose.yml file :

extra_hosts:
    - "host.docker.internal:host-gateway"

Otherwise, read below


TLDR

Use --network="host" in your docker run command, then 127.0.0.1 in your docker container will point to your docker host.

Note: This mode only works on Docker for Linux, per the documentation.


Note on docker container networking modes

Docker offers different networking modes when running containers. Depending on the mode you choose you would connect to your MySQL database running on the docker host differently.

docker run --network="bridge" (default)

Docker creates a bridge named docker0 by default. Both the docker host and the docker containers have an IP address on that bridge.

on the Docker host, type sudo ip addr show docker0 you will have an output looking like:

[vagrant@docker:~] $ sudo ip addr show docker0
4: docker0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default
    link/ether 56:84:7a:fe:97:99 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 172.17.42.1/16 scope global docker0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::5484:7aff:fefe:9799/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

So here my docker host has the IP address 172.17.42.1 on the docker0 network interface.

Now start a new container and get a shell on it: docker run --rm -it ubuntu:trusty bash and within the container type ip addr show eth0 to discover how its main network interface is set up:

root@e77f6a1b3740:/# ip addr show eth0
863: eth0: <BROADCAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 66:32:13:f0:f1:e3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 172.17.1.192/16 scope global eth0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::6432:13ff:fef0:f1e3/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

Here my container has the IP address 172.17.1.192. Now look at the routing table:

root@e77f6a1b3740:/# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
default         172.17.42.1     0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0
172.17.0.0      *               255.255.0.0     U     0      0        0 eth0

So the IP Address of the docker host 172.17.42.1 is set as the default route and is accessible from your container.

root@e77f6a1b3740:/# ping 172.17.42.1
PING 172.17.42.1 (172.17.42.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 172.17.42.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.070 ms
64 bytes from 172.17.42.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.201 ms
64 bytes from 172.17.42.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.116 ms

docker run --network="host"

Alternatively you can run a docker container with network settings set to host. Such a container will share the network stack with the docker host and from the container point of view, localhost (or 127.0.0.1) will refer to the docker host.

Be aware that any port opened in your docker container would be opened on the docker host. And this without requiring the -p or -P docker run option.

IP config on my docker host:

[vagrant@docker:~] $ ip addr show eth0
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 08:00:27:98:dc:aa brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 10.0.2.15/24 brd 10.0.2.255 scope global eth0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::a00:27ff:fe98:dcaa/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

and from a docker container in host mode:

[vagrant@docker:~] $ docker run --rm -it --network=host ubuntu:trusty ip addr show eth0
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 08:00:27:98:dc:aa brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 10.0.2.15/24 brd 10.0.2.255 scope global eth0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::a00:27ff:fe98:dcaa/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

As you can see both the docker host and docker container share the exact same network interface and as such have the same IP address.


Connecting to MySQL from containers

bridge mode

To access MySQL running on the docker host from containers in bridge mode, you need to make sure the MySQL service is listening for connections on the 172.17.42.1 IP address.

To do so, make sure you have either bind-address = 172.17.42.1 or bind-address = 0.0.0.0 in your MySQL config file (my.cnf).

If you need to set an environment variable with the IP address of the gateway, you can run the following code in a container :

export DOCKER_HOST_IP=$(route -n | awk '/UG[ \t]/{print $2}')

then in your application, use the DOCKER_HOST_IP environment variable to open the connection to MySQL.

Note: if you use bind-address = 0.0.0.0 your MySQL server will listen for connections on all network interfaces. That means your MySQL server could be reached from the Internet ; make sure to set up firewall rules accordingly.

Note 2: if you use bind-address = 172.17.42.1 your MySQL server won't listen for connections made to 127.0.0.1. Processes running on the docker host that would want to connect to MySQL would have to use the 172.17.42.1 IP address.

host mode

To access MySQL running on the docker host from containers in host mode, you can keep bind-address = 127.0.0.1 in your MySQL configuration and connect to 127.0.0.1 from your containers:

[vagrant@docker:~] $ docker run --rm -it --network=host mysql mysql -h 127.0.0.1 -uroot -p
Enter password:
Welcome to the MySQL monitor.  Commands end with ; or \g.
Your MySQL connection id is 36
Server version: 5.5.41-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 (Ubuntu)

Copyright (c) 2000, 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Oracle is a registered trademark of Oracle Corporation and/or its affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the current input statement.

mysql>

note: Do use mysql -h 127.0.0.1 and not mysql -h localhost; otherwise the MySQL client would try to connect using a unix socket.

Thomasleveil
  • 95,867
  • 15
  • 119
  • 113
  • 25
    Thank you for such a detailed answer! From what I've gathered, using host mode is the only way to get this functionality through localhost. I haven't tried but I would assume you could create a separate network to connect containers over their own bridge offering them a common 'localhost'. – Ben May 12 '15 at 05:45
  • 3
    There is also a guide on Advanced Networking at https://docs.docker.com/articles/networking/ – Thomasleveil May 12 '15 at 08:26
  • 34
    Note for OSX users: log into your docker virtual machine first (boot2docker), using "docker-machine ssh default" , then run "sudo ip addr show docker0". Continue with Thomas' instructions from there. – Charlie Dalsass Oct 01 '15 at 22:19
  • 38
    I am running Docker for Mac, and there is no 172.17.42.1 anymore, no docker0 anymore. It was 172.17.0.1 as gateway, and can't even `telnet 172.17.0.1 3306` – zx1986 Jun 30 '16 at 03:35
  • 3
    There is a reason they didn't try to make this easy. It's better to have all the dependencies dockerized as well, which allows you to sidestep this whole problem. – Jonah Aug 10 '16 at 07:41
  • 41
    You can mount the mysql socket into the container instead of networking like `-v /var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock:/tmp/mysql.sock` this. – chx Sep 02 '16 at 05:30
  • 10
    Can someone address the situation when your running Docker on Mac and not using boot2docker as such there is no docker0 interface? – TheJKFever Feb 09 '17 at 19:10
  • 1
    if you get access denied from inside docker container, you may need to allow root access outside localhost, with `GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON *.* TO 'root'@'%' IDENTIFIED BY 'password' WITH GRANT OPTION;` – ospider Jul 13 '17 at 09:16
  • 4
    For anyone trying to connect to a host service and running Docker for Mac. There is special Mac-only DNS name `docker.for.mac.host.internal`, which resolves to the internal IP address used by the host. [source](https://docs.docker.com/docker-for-mac/networking/#known-limitations-use-cases-and-workarounds) – MikeV Mar 21 '18 at 23:50
  • 3
    The latest version of Docker supports `host.docker.internal` as a domain name from the container (as per the latest update in @Janne Annala 's [answer](https://stackoverflow.com/a/43541681/865883) ). Going forward, that appears to be the more general solution when you still want some level of isolation between the container and host networks. – funseiki Apr 19 '18 at 20:33
  • 4
    @funseiki note that for docker 18.04.0-ce `host.docker.internal` does not work for Linux. It only works for docker-for-Windows and docker-for-mac. See https://github.com/docker/for-linux/issues/264 – Thomasleveil Apr 20 '18 at 05:55
  • 3
    `--net=host` breaks published port translation so that if the container exposes port 80 (using `--publish XXX:80` or more simply `-p XXX:80` then if a service on the host is already bound to port 80 (a docker instance or a host native service) then the container will not be able to bind the port 80. So it's not good in any situation. – Eric May 02 '18 at 17:26
  • if you are using a mac, the host system will not show you on the host (mac) any ip address for the brdige netwrok. So when you want to contact from the mac the docker machine you need to use the port forward -p whateverPort1:whateverport2 and use localhost. On the other hand, from the docker machine the something like this would work: telnet host.docker.internal 445 – 99Sono Nov 17 '19 at 10:02
  • You can see the mac directions since Docker version 18.03 referencing `host.docker.internal` [here](https://docs.docker.com/docker-for-mac/networking/#i-want-to-connect-from-a-container-to-a-service-on-the-host) – Zephaniah Grunschlag May 08 '20 at 15:38
  • Just tried `--network="host"` in Docker Desktop for Windows (2.3.0.2) and it worked perfectly fine. – Loek May 21 '20 at 09:35
  • This is by a fair margin one of the top 5 best answers I've come by on SO! Thomasleveil thx for your ATI ( attention, time, and interest) <3 @iam.Carrot huge kudos for maintaining this answer :plusone: and :thumbsup: – walt_die Jun 12 '20 at 05:25
  • This partly solved my problem - `host.docker.internal` worked perfectly. However, I'm trying to access an IIS site hosted locally, and I get an SSL error because, sure, I don't have an SSL cert for `host.docker.internal`. Is there a way to generate a local cert for that use? – Peter Tirrell Jul 02 '20 at 13:58
  • @PeterTirrell I’m having the same issue you described. Were you able to find a solution? – massaskillz Jul 23 '20 at 19:52
  • 1
    @massaskillz I didn't, really. In my case I was using an internal wrapper class around HttpClient to make the call, so I customized the HttpClientHandler.ServerCertificateCustomValidationCallback to basically intercept any SSL validation errors and ignore them if the RequestUri contains "host.docker.internal". It's hacky, but got me on my way for debugging. – Peter Tirrell Jul 27 '20 at 20:51
  • 1
    Running docker like: `docker run --rm -d -p 5000:5000/tcp mytestimage:latest --network="host"` does not work. I get an error that it cannot connect to 127.0.0.1. The only thing that worked was in my C# code, using `host.docker.internal` instead of `localhost` or `127.0.0.1`. Any idea why this wouldn't work on Docker on Windows? – Don Rhummy Sep 21 '20 at 19:49
  • 1
    Outstanding answer! I just wanted to add that to get this same to work in a `docker-compose.yml`, you must add an `extra-hosts` [entry](https://github.com/compose-spec/compose-spec/blob/master/spec.md#extra_hosts) with `host.docker.internal:host-gateway`, just like you would with the `docker run --add-host`. Perhaps @Thomasleveil could add that to the top edit too. Took me a bit to figure that one out. – kzu May 22 '21 at 18:48
  • does it works for windows containers - seems not. – Dzmitry Lahoda Jul 14 '21 at 10:06
  • `--network="host"` in `docker run` solved my problem – Syed Muhammad Asad Sep 03 '21 at 09:17
  • This works unfortunately only for [Docker Desktop](https://docs.docker.com/desktop/mac/networking/#use-cases-and-workarounds). This is for development purpose and will not work in a production environment outside of Docker Desktop for Mac. – Pavol Travnik Oct 05 '21 at 14:58
  • 2
    So much for "write once ship everywhere". – TheRealChx101 Feb 12 '22 at 11:49
  • I can see http://:5000/ is working in docker compose – Manu Janardhanan Jun 07 '22 at 03:39
  • What about images without the `route` command? – SOFe Aug 25 '22 at 08:56
  • using host.docker.internal:host-gateway works on windows, my issue was my spring application properties was referring to "localhost" and not "host.docker.internal" as mysql hostname hence mysql was not getting connected – Abdeali Chandanwala Feb 07 '23 at 10:48
721

For all platforms

Docker v 20.10 and above (since December 14th 2020)

Use your internal IP address or connect to the special DNS name host.docker.internal which will resolve to the internal IP address used by the host.

This is for development purpose and does not work in a production environment outside of Docker Desktop.

Linux caveats

To enable this in Docker on Linux, add --add-host=host.docker.internal:host-gateway to your docker command to enable the feature.

To enable this in Docker Compose on Linux, add the following lines to the container definition:

extra_hosts:
    - "host.docker.internal:host-gateway"

According to some users the special DNS name only works within the Docker's default bridge network, not within custom networks.

For older macOS and Windows versions of Docker

Docker v 18.03 and above (since March 21st 2018)

Use your internal IP address or connect to the special DNS name host.docker.internal which will resolve to the internal IP address used by the host.

Linux support pending https://github.com/docker/for-linux/issues/264

For older macOS versions of Docker

Docker for Mac v 17.12 to v 18.02

Same as above but use docker.for.mac.host.internal instead.

Docker for Mac v 17.06 to v 17.11

Same as above but use docker.for.mac.localhost instead.

Docker for Mac 17.05 and below

To access host machine from the docker container you must attach an IP alias to your network interface. You can bind whichever IP you want, just make sure you're not using it to anything else.

sudo ifconfig lo0 alias 123.123.123.123/24

Then make sure that you server is listening to the IP mentioned above or 0.0.0.0. If it's listening on localhost 127.0.0.1 it will not accept the connection.

Then just point your docker container to this IP and you can access the host machine!

To test you can run something like curl -X GET 123.123.123.123:3000 inside the container.

The alias will reset on every reboot so create a start-up script if necessary.

Solution and more documentation here: https://docs.docker.com/desktop/networking/#use-cases-and-workarounds-for-all-platforms

Janne Annala
  • 25,928
  • 8
  • 31
  • 41
  • 10
    brilliant and thanks, this worked for me from within the container. `mysql -uroot -hdocker.for.mac.localhost` – Richard Frank Jul 22 '17 at 05:46
  • 3
    docker.for.mac.localhost Is exactly what I was looking for. But this is dirty as hell at the same time. IN docker, one would expect that the hook docker.for.mac.localhost would be a generic docker internal name that would be valid for any operating system, not just for Mac. But for development purposes this is good enough. – 99Sono Dec 03 '17 at 15:06
  • 1
    DNS name docker.for.mac.host.internal should be used instead of docker.for.mac.localhost (still valid) for host resolution from containers, since there is an RFC banning the use of subdomains of localhost. See https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-west-let-localhost-be-localhost-06. – Jya Feb 19 '18 at 13:46
  • This doesn't work for me. When I `docker run -e HOSTNAME= docker.for.mac.host.internal `, the container is created but nothign happens. I have to then crtl+C. With `--net=host -e HOSTNAME=localhost` at least the container runs and complains that it can't find the service I need (MySQL db). – Jorge Orpinel Pérez Mar 11 '18 at 01:18
  • thanks a lot, field "docker.for.mac.host.internal" works for macOs – quento Oct 28 '20 at 15:48
  • 2
    Looks like on Linux this works only if the container is on default docker `bridge` network `172.17.0.0` which is the one used by `docker0` interface. This won't work if you create a new network and add containers to it. – hldev Apr 24 '22 at 20:39
  • `extra_hosts: - "host.docker.internal:host-gateway"` does not work on Linux. – Jonny Jul 12 '22 at 08:45
  • added `extra_hosts: - "host.docker.internal:host-gateway" ` in docker-compsoe file and it worked like charm . thanks @Janne – Saikat Roy Jul 21 '22 at 10:07
  • It never worked for Linux, so "for all platforms" is misleading, the answer is clearly incorrect. – sortas Jan 22 '23 at 13:24
  • It surely does, the instructions are just incorrect, so they should be removed, and there're multiple comments (including mine) to confirm it. – sortas Feb 14 '23 at 12:55
  • This answer does not work for me on Debian 11. I have added `host.docker.internal:host-gateway` to `extra_hosts`, and in the container's `/etc/hosts/` I can see `172.17.0.1 host.docker.internal`, but from within the container I still get `can't connect to remote host (172.17.0.1): Connection refused`. – aSemy Mar 14 '23 at 13:21
  • 1
    @aSemy Are you using a custom network instead of the default docker network? In that case it unfortunately doesn't work on Linux. – Janne Annala Mar 15 '23 at 13:27
309

Use

host.docker.internal

instead of

localhost
joel
  • 6,359
  • 2
  • 30
  • 55
DeyaEldeen
  • 10,847
  • 10
  • 42
  • 75
125

I doing a hack similar to above posts of get the local IP to map to a alias name (DNS) in the container. The major problem is to get dynamically with a simple script that works both in Linux and OSX the host IP address. I did this script that works in both environments (even in Linux distribution with "$LANG" != "en_*" configured):

ifconfig | grep -E "([0-9]{1,3}\.){3}[0-9]{1,3}" | grep -v 127.0.0.1 | awk '{ print $2 }' | cut -f2 -d: | head -n1

So, using Docker Compose, the full configuration will be:

Startup script (docker-run.sh):

export DOCKERHOST=$(ifconfig | grep -E "([0-9]{1,3}\.){3}[0-9]{1,3}" | grep -v 127.0.0.1 | awk '{ print $2 }' | cut -f2 -d: | head -n1)
docker-compose -f docker-compose.yml up

docker-compose.yml:

myapp:
  build: .
  ports:
    - "80:80"
  extra_hosts:
    - "dockerhost:$DOCKERHOST"

Then change http://localhost to http://dockerhost in your code.

For a more advance guide of how to customize the DOCKERHOST script, take a look at this post with a explanation of how it works.

Marco Altran
  • 376
  • 2
  • 9
Mariano Ruiz
  • 4,314
  • 2
  • 38
  • 34
  • 1
    Depending on your use case, you might even just get away with using the `DOCKERHOST` value here instead of "localhost" or 0.0.0.0 in whatever service your docker container needs to connect to locally. – enderland Mar 15 '17 at 15:51
  • 6
    I have slightly modified your solution to be compatible with custom networks: `export DOCKERHOST=$(docker network inspect --format='{{range .IPAM.Config}}{{.Gateway}}{{end}}' | awk -F "/" 'NR==1{print $1}')` Where __ could be _bridge_ or the name of the network as defined by docker-compose (usually _path-name_**-**_network_name_). – dieresys Apr 26 '17 at 17:09
  • 1
    You need to add a comment: use `dockerhost` as the host for db connection (usualy replace for `localhost` in config file). – Justin Jun 30 '17 at 11:12
  • weird solution, but its the only that make xdebug work under docker with php cli – Eddie Dec 16 '19 at 11:08
  • Acl stopped working after this solution in haproxy. Any idea why? – HyukHyukBoi Jan 28 '20 at 18:27
59

Solution for Linux (kernel >=3.6).

Ok, your localhost server has a default docker interface docker0 with IP address 172.17.0.1. Your container started with default network settings --net="bridge".

  1. Enable route_localnet for docker0 interface:

    $ sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.docker0.route_localnet=1
    
  2. Add these rules to iptables:

    $ iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -i docker0 -d 172.17.0.1 -p tcp --dport 3306 -j DNAT --to 127.0.0.1:3306
    $ iptables -t filter -I INPUT -i docker0 -d 127.0.0.1 -p tcp --dport 3306 -j ACCEPT
    
  3. Create MySQL user with access from '%' that means - from anyone, excluding localhost:

    CREATE USER 'user'@'%' IDENTIFIED BY 'password';
    
  4. Change in your script the mysql-server address to 172.17.0.1.

From the kernel documentation:

route_localnet - BOOLEAN: Do not consider loopback addresses as martian source or destination while routing. This enables the use of 127/8 for local routing purposes (default FALSE).

simhumileco
  • 31,877
  • 16
  • 137
  • 115
Ray D
  • 624
  • 5
  • 4
  • 5
    What is the purpose of second iptable command? I can understand the first one is to rewrite all tcp destination that match 172.17.0.1:3306 to 127.0.0.1:3306 but why is the second iptable command necessary? – Patrick Sep 12 '19 at 14:34
  • 1
    This made my day! Thank you for sharing – tuna Apr 27 '21 at 20:58
  • finally. I struggled to find the right IP Address. I didnt know there was a default interface for docker. – Pfinnn Jul 04 '22 at 10:41
  • Strangely this is not stable for me, at least on latest CentOS 7 running kernel 3.10 with Docker 19.03.15. It works initially, then after some time stops working. – user2679436 Jul 15 '22 at 11:45
  • Depending on your firewall/iptables configuration (-P DROP, ...), you might want to add a more generic entry that allows the whole docker range in. I ended up using this `iptables -I INPUT -s 172.16.0.0/12 -j ACCEPT` to allow connections to `host.docker.internal` – shtrom Jan 07 '23 at 12:38
54

This worked for me on an NGINX/PHP-FPM stack without touching any code or networking where the app's just expecting to be able to connect to localhost

Mount mysqld.sock from the host to inside the container.

Find the location of the mysql.sock file on the host running mysql:
netstat -ln | awk '/mysql(.*)?\.sock/ { print $9 }'

Mount that file to where it's expected in the docker:
docker run -v /hostpath/to/mysqld.sock:/containerpath/to/mysqld.sock

Possible locations of mysqld.sock:

/tmp/mysqld.sock
/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock 
/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock
/Applications/MAMP/tmp/mysql/mysql.sock # if running via MAMP
d-_-b
  • 21,536
  • 40
  • 150
  • 256
user833482
  • 539
  • 4
  • 4
  • 2
    This is a much cleaner solution, not exposing Mysql to the outside (if not using a firewall). – user1226868 Jun 06 '15 at 14:45
  • 5
    Sockets do not scale as well as TCP because they block more often and can cause weird behavior. Use TCP whenever possible. – Joel E Salas Jan 19 '16 at 21:54
  • 9
    @JoelESalas Do you have a source for that claim? – Private Oct 13 '16 at 09:21
  • I have found this to be the easiest solution. Thumbs up user833482! You should contribute more often to StackOverflow. – Private Oct 13 '16 at 10:32
  • 5
    @JoelESalas I think you're mistaken. The mysql client library even uses unix sockets by default when connecting to localhost rather than actually making a connection to localhost. A unix socket avoids the overhead of the TCP stack and routing, and should run faster. – M Conrad Jan 11 '17 at 01:28
  • This solution ultimately worked for my use case of connecting logstash running in a container to MariaDB running on my host using JDBC. However, there is a catch that you have to include JNA dependency. Leaving this as a breadcrumb for others: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25918416/jdbc-mysql-connection-using-unix-socket/40180379 – Maksym Dec 05 '20 at 17:30
45

Until host.docker.internal is working for every platform, you can use my container acting as a NAT gateway without any manual setup:

https://github.com/qoomon/docker-host

slhck
  • 36,575
  • 28
  • 148
  • 201
qoomon
  • 4,549
  • 1
  • 21
  • 27
  • 15
    I can confirm this doesn't work in Docker for Windows 19.03.2 with Windows container. – KMC Sep 17 '19 at 12:57
  • any idea how to fix that? (I'm not a windows user) – qoomon Sep 18 '19 at 05:12
  • If you environment doesn't block port mysql uses, you can refer to the server by the computer name it is hosted. So in you connection string, use your computer name as a server name. – KMC Sep 18 '19 at 12:26
  • 2
    I can confirm this does NOT WORK on Docker for Windows v. 20.10.5. It's infuriating. The IP of the host (from the container) changes randomly. How the hell am I supposed to deploy a connection string when the host IP changes at runtime and host.docker.internal resolves to nothing? – Triynko Apr 26 '21 at 04:32
  • @Triynko how do you determine the host ip currently? – qoomon Apr 27 '21 at 06:12
  • 1
    @Triynko may you can run following commands and tell me if any of these succeed? `docker run --rm alpine ping host.docker.internal` `docker run --rm alpine ping docker.for.win.localhost` `docker run --rm alpine ping gateway.docker.internal` – qoomon Apr 27 '21 at 06:24
31

Simplest solution for Mac OSX

Just use the IP address of your Mac. On the Mac run this to get the IP address and use it from within the container:

ifconfig | grep 'inet 192'| awk '{ print $2}'

As long as the server running locally on your Mac or in another docker container is listening to 0.0.0.0, the docker container will be able to reach out at that address.

If you just want to access another docker container that is listening on 0.0.0.0 you can use 172.17.0.1

Stephen Ostermiller
  • 23,933
  • 14
  • 88
  • 109
dansalmo
  • 11,506
  • 5
  • 58
  • 53
  • 5
    Docker for Mac exposes the `docker.for.mac.host.internal` hostname now. – Matt Mar 23 '18 at 03:02
  • 1
    `host.docker.internal` is available on mac. More info here: https://docs.docker.com/desktop/networking/#i-want-to-connect-from-a-container-to-a-service-on-the-host – Mirodinho Jul 18 '22 at 21:35
26

Very simple and quick, check your host IP with ifconfig (linux) or ipconfig (windows) and then create a docker-compose.yml:

version: '3' # specify docker-compose version
services:
  nginx:
    build: ./ # specify the directory of the Dockerfile
    ports:
      - "8080:80" # specify port mapping
    extra_hosts:
      - "dockerhost:<yourIP>"

This way, your container will be able to access your host. When accessing your DB, remember to use the name you specified before, in this case dockerhost and the port of your host in which the DB is running.

Ali
  • 922
  • 1
  • 9
  • 24
Felipe Toledo
  • 599
  • 1
  • 10
  • 16
  • In HaProxy, this solution has stopped working of the acl's for some reason, only the default setting is working. – HyukHyukBoi Jan 28 '20 at 17:31
  • This worked for me! I'm using docker (not docker desktop) inside wsl 2 on Windows. I need to make request from inside container using HttpURLConnection (java) to localhost/test.php in host machine running by XAMPP. Get your local network IP of Windows PC and add to above, then use dockerhost as domain when making request. – le hien Feb 09 '23 at 09:40
25

Several solutions come to mind:

  1. Move your dependencies into containers first
  2. Make your other services externally accessible and connect to them with that external IP
  3. Run your containers without network isolation
  4. Avoid connecting over the network, use a socket that is mounted as a volume instead

The reason this doesn't work out of the box is that containers run with their own network namespace by default. That means localhost (or 127.0.0.1 pointing to the loopback interface) is unique per container. Connecting to this will connect to the container itself, and not services running outside of docker or inside of a different docker container.

Option 1: If your dependency can be moved into a container, I would do this first. It makes your application stack portable as others try to run your container on their own environment. And you can still publish the port on your host where other services that have not been migrated can still reach it. You can even publish the port to the localhost interface on your docker host to avoid it being externally accessible with a syntax like: -p 127.0.0.1:3306:3306 for the published port.

Option 2: There are a variety of ways to detect the host IP address from inside of the container, but each have a limited number of scenarios where they work (e.g. requiring Docker for Mac). The most portable option is to inject your host IP into the container with something like an environment variable or configuration file, e.g.:

docker run --rm -e "HOST_IP=$(ip route get 1 | sed -n 's/^.*src \([0-9.]*\) .*$/\1/p')" ...

This does require that your service is listening on that external interface, which could be a security concern. For other methods to get the host IP address from inside of the container, see this post.

Slightly less portable is to use host.docker.internal. This works in current versions of Docker for Windows and Docker for Mac. And in 20.10, the capability has been added to Docker for Linux when you pass a special host entry with:

docker run --add-host host.docker.internal:host-gateway ...

The host-gateway is a special value added in Docker 20.10 that automatically expands to a host IP. For more details see this PR.

Option 3: Running without network isolation, i.e. running with --net host, means your application is running on the host network namespace. This is less isolation for the container, and it means you cannot access other containers over a shared docker network with DNS (instead, you need to use published ports to access other containerized applications). But for applications that need to access other services on the host that are only listening on 127.0.0.1 on the host, this can be the easiest option.

Option 4: Various services also allow access over a filesystem based socket. This socket can be mounted into the container as a bind mounted volume, allowing you to access the host service without going over the network. For access to the docker engine, you often see examples of mounting /var/run/docker.sock into the container (giving that container root access to the host). With mysql, you can try something like -v /var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock:/var/run/mysqld/mysql.sock and then connect to localhost which mysql converts to using the socket.

BMitch
  • 231,797
  • 42
  • 475
  • 450
  • for option2 (the only thing that worked from all the answers) : the following command gets the the ip address of an interface other than local host on both osx and linux: ```ifconfig | grep 'inet ' | grep -v 127.0.0.1 | awk '{ print $2 }' | head -1 | sed -n 's/[^0-9]*\([0-9\.]*\)/\1/p'``` – MichaelMoser Mar 23 '21 at 07:26
  • `--add-host host.docker.internal:host-gateway` is golden – sanmai May 26 '21 at 03:11
22

Solution for Windows 10

Docker Community Edition 17.06.0-ce-win18 2017-06-28 (stable)

You can use DNS name of the host docker.for.win.localhost, to resolve to the internal IP. (Warning some sources mentioned windows but it should be win)

Overview
I needed to do something similar, that is connect from my Docker container to my localhost, which was running the Azure Storage Emulator and CosmosDB Emulator.

The Azure Storage Emulator by default listens on 127.0.0.1, while you can change the IP its bound too, I was looking for a solution that would work with default settings.

This also works for connecting from my Docker container to SQL Server and IIS, both running locally on my host with default port settings.

Ralph Willgoss
  • 11,750
  • 4
  • 64
  • 67
  • Unfortunately, currently, windows (at least docker desktop) is not supporting --net=host, check https://docs.docker.com/network/network-tutorial-host/#prerequisites – Nigrimmist Oct 31 '22 at 21:47
21

For windows,

I have changed the database url in spring configuration: spring.datasource.url=jdbc:postgresql://host.docker.internal:5432/apidb

Then build the image and run. It worked for me.

16

None of the answers worked for me when using Docker Toolbox on Windows 10 Home, but 10.0.2.2 did, since it uses VirtualBox which exposes the host to the VM on this address.

Stephen Ostermiller
  • 23,933
  • 14
  • 88
  • 109
Elad
  • 633
  • 5
  • 13
  • 2
    It works. Even no need to specify --network=host. looks like 10.0.2.2 is set as a default IP for the host. Thanks. – TheManish Mar 27 '19 at 14:25
  • 1
    But, Can I use this static IP for all the versions of Windows and Mac?, how can I handle it for multiple platforms via script? – 151291 Mar 31 '20 at 05:04
  • This worked for me. Just run ipconfig on your host (windows) and get the IP address under `Ethernet adapter vEthernet (DockerNAT)` – Kihats May 02 '20 at 12:55
16

For Linux, where you cannot change the interface the localhost service binds to

There are two problems we need to solve

  1. Getting the IP of the host
  2. Making our localhost service available to Docker

The first problem can be solved using qoomon's docker-host image, as given by other answers.

You will need to add this container to the same bridge network as your other container so that you can access it. Open a terminal inside your container and ensure that you can ping dockerhost.

bash-5.0# ping dockerhost
PING dockerhost (172.20.0.2): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 172.20.0.2: seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.523 ms

Now, the harder problem, making the service accessible to docker.

We can use telnet to check if we can access a port on the host (you may need to install this).

The problem is that our container will only be able to access services that bind to all interfaces, such as SSH:

bash-5.0# telnet dockerhost 22
SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.6p1 Ubuntu-4ubuntu0.3

But services bound only to localhost will be inaccessible:

bash-5.0# telnet dockerhost 1025
telnet: can't connect to remote host (172.20.0.2): Connection refused

The proper solution here would be to bind the service to dockers bridge network. However, this answer assumes that it is not possible for you to change this. So we will instead use iptables.

First, we need to find the name of the bridge network that docker is using with ifconfig. If you are using an unnamed bridge, this will just be docker0. However, if you are using a named network you will have a bridge starting with br- that docker will be using instead. Mine is br-5cd80298d6f4.

Once we have the name of this bridge, we need to allow routing from this bridge to localhost. This is disabled by default for security reasons:

sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.<bridge_name>.route_localnet=1

Now to set up our iptables rule. Since our container can only access ports on the docker bridge network, we are going to pretend that our service is actually bound to a port on this network.

To do this, we will forward all requests to <docker_bridge>:port to localhost:port

iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i <docker_bridge_name> --dport <service_port> -j DNAT --to-destination 127.0.0.1:<service_port>

For example, for my service on port 1025

iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i br-5cd80298d6f4 --dport 1025 -j DNAT --to-destination 127.0.0.1:1025

You should now be able to access your service from the container:

bash-5.0# telnet dockerhost 1025
220 127.0.0.1 ESMTP Service Ready
JShorthouse
  • 1,450
  • 13
  • 28
  • 2
    This is the same as what @ray-d has mentioned above, but is nicely explained. Thank you! Additionally, when using docker-compose, I had to also add a DNAT rule in the PREROUTING chain for all packets arriving on the docker0 interface too: because, docker-compose seem to be using docker0 during builds (not during runs, surprisingly): `sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.docker0.route_localnet=1` and `iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i docker0 --dport 1025 -j DNAT --to-destination 127.0.0.1:1025` – arvindd Mar 26 '20 at 12:06
15

This is not an answer to the actual question. This is how I solved a similar problem. The solution comes totally from: Define Docker Container Networking so Containers can Communicate. Thanks to Nic Raboy

Leaving this here for others who might want to do REST calls between one container and another. Answers the question: what to use in place of localhost in a docker environment?

Get how your network looks like docker network ls

Create a new network docker network create -d my-net

Start the first container docker run -d -p 5000:5000 --network="my-net" --name "first_container" <MyImage1:v0.1>

Check out network settings for first container docker inspect first_container. "Networks": should have 'my-net'

Start the second container docker run -d -p 6000:6000 --network="my-net" --name "second_container" <MyImage2:v0.1>

Check out network settings for second container docker inspect second_container. "Networks": should have 'my-net'

ssh into your second container docker exec -it second_container sh or docker exec -it second_container bash.

Inside of the second container, you can ping the first container by ping first_container. Also, your code calls such as http://localhost:5000 can be replaced by http://first_container:5000

Shirish Hirekodi
  • 392
  • 4
  • 13
15

If you're running with --net=host, localhost should work fine. If you're using default networking, use the static IP 172.17.0.1.

See this - https://stackoverflow.com/a/48547074/14120621

Prince
  • 197
  • 3
  • 8
14

For those on Windows, assuming you're using the bridge network driver, you'll want to specifically bind MySQL to the IP address of the hyper-v network interface.

This is done via the configuration file under the normally hidden C:\ProgramData\MySQL folder.

Binding to 0.0.0.0 will not work. The address needed is shown in the docker configuration as well, and in my case was 10.0.75.1.

Stephen Ostermiller
  • 23,933
  • 14
  • 88
  • 109
Casey
  • 1,573
  • 14
  • 17
  • 5
    You deserve a medal! I've been working on this for two full days. Thank you for helping out! – Michael Aug 03 '17 at 23:08
  • 1
    I was also working on this for two full days. This is the only place on the web I've found it mentioned. Microsoft is completely silent on this when it talks about connecting to MSSQL from within a Docker container. It makes you wonder if they ever got it working themselves! – Contango Nov 02 '17 at 15:44
12

Edit: I ended up prototyping out the concept on GitHub. Check out: https://github.com/sivabudh/system-in-a-box


First, my answer is geared towards 2 groups of people: those who use a Mac, and those who use Linux.

The host network mode doesn't work on a Mac. You have to use an IP alias, see: https://stackoverflow.com/a/43541681/2713729

What is a host network mode? See: https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/run/#/network-settings

Secondly, for those of you who are using Linux (my direct experience was with Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and I'm upgrading to 16.04 LTS in production soon), yes, you can make the service running inside a Docker container connect to localhost services running on the Docker host (eg. your laptop).

How?

The key is when you run the Docker container, you have to run it with the host mode. The command looks like this:

docker run --network="host" -id <Docker image ID>

When you do an ifconfig (you will need to apt-get install net-tools your container for ifconfig to be callable) inside your container, you will see that the network interfaces are the same as the one on Docker host (eg. your laptop).

It's important to note that I'm a Mac user, but I run Ubuntu under Parallels, so using a Mac is not a disadvantage. ;-)

And this is how you connect NGINX container to the MySQL running on a localhost.

Community
  • 1
  • 1
sivabudh
  • 31,807
  • 63
  • 162
  • 228
  • 1
    It's important to note that the **host** mode offers better performance since it uses the OS network stack. – sivabudh Feb 07 '17 at 08:21
  • 2
    Very good point there. Although it IS possible to connect from a container to a host service with unused IP attach https://docs.docker.com/docker-for-mac/networking/ . Not a pleasant solution... but works. – Xavier Huppé Feb 24 '17 at 17:13
  • Good stuff here. Once inside the container with `--network="host"`, how does one connect to the host mysql for example? – Michael Millar May 22 '17 at 10:39
  • 1
    @Buccleuch Just use `localhost`. Check out my GitHub source code: https://github.com/sivabudh/system-in-a-box/blob/master/dj_host_docker/settings.py. Search for `'HOST'`, you will see 127.0.0.1 to connect to Postgresql. – sivabudh May 22 '17 at 11:00
  • I was able to get access to the host mysql databases by mounting the volume as per @user833482, and after installing mysql-client and server on the docker container of course. – Michael Millar May 22 '17 at 11:07
12

First see this answer for the options that you have to fix this problem. But if you use docker-compose you can add network_mode: host to your service and then use 127.0.0.1 to connect to the local host. This is just one of the options described in the answer above. Below you can find how I modified docker-compose.yml from https://github.com/geerlingguy/php-apache-container.git:

 ---
 version: "3"
 services:
   php-apache:
+    network_mode: host
     image: geerlingguy/php-apache:latest
     container_name: php-apache
...

+ indicates the line I added.


[Additional info] This has also worked in version 2.2. and "host" or just 'host' are both worked in docker-compose.

 ---
 version: "2.2"

 services:
   php-apache:
+    network_mode: "host"
        or
+    network_mode: host
...
Ehsan88
  • 3,569
  • 5
  • 29
  • 52
  • Yup. Its works with: network_mode: host Now can access local /etc/hosts domain names who points to another project docker containers. – Ernestyno Dec 18 '20 at 13:19
9

I disagree with the answer from Thomasleveil.

Making mysql bind to 172.17.42.1 will prevent other programs using the database on the host to reach it. This will only work if all your database users are dockerized.

Making mysql bind to 0.0.0.0 will open the db to outside world, which is not only a very bad thing to do, but also contrary to what the original question author wants to do. He explicitly says "The MySql is running on localhost and not exposing a port to the outside world, so its bound on localhost"

To answer the comment from ivant

"Why not bind mysql to docker0 as well?"

This is not possible. The mysql/mariadb documentation explicitly says it is not possible to bind to several interfaces. You can only bind to 0, 1, or all interfaces.

As a conclusion, I have NOT found any way to reach the (localhost only) database on the host from a docker container. That definitely seems like a very very common pattern, but I don't know how to do it.

Bruno Bieri
  • 9,724
  • 11
  • 63
  • 92
orzel
  • 322
  • 2
  • 7
  • 4
    from the docker host you could still connect to the MySQL server using the `172.17.42.1` address. But your note is right otherwise. Aso, I edited my answer with the `host` networking mode that allows to keep the MySQL server bound to `127.0.0.1` while allowing containers to connect to it – Thomasleveil Mar 13 '15 at 23:31
  • no, as I said, you can't connect to 172.17.42.1 if mysql is bound to localhost. – orzel Mar 14 '15 at 04:19
  • 5
    "Making mysql bind to 172.17.42.1 will prevent other programs using the database on the host to reach it." - that is not true. Other programs can use mysql, they just have to connect to 172.17.42.1 instead of localhost/127.0.0.1. – 0x89 Mar 09 '16 at 16:00
  • The solution to the problem in this answer generally is to get the MySQL server to bind to `0.0.0.0` and then set up a firewall so that the db is not accessible from the internet. – halfer Jun 16 '17 at 15:05
8

Try this:

version: '3.5'
services:
  yourservice-here:
    container_name: container_name
    ports:
      - "4000:4000"
    extra_hosts: # <---- here
      - localhost:192.168.1.202
      - or-vitualhost.local:192.168.1.202

To get 192.168.1.202, uses ifconfig

This worked for me. Hope this help!

Binh Ho
  • 3,690
  • 1
  • 31
  • 31
  • This is a neat little trick. I haven't tried it but that's a pretty handy quick solution – Ray Nov 29 '21 at 21:21
8

In 7 years the question was asked, it is either docker has changed, or no one tried this way. So I will include my own answer.

I have found all answers use complex methods. Today, I have needed this, and found 2 very simple ways:

  • use ipconfig or ifconfig on your host and make note of all IP addresses. At least two of them can be used by the container.

    • I have a fixed local network address on WiFi LAN Adapter: 192.168.1.101. This could be 10.0.1.101. the result will change depending on your router
    • I use WSL on windows, and it has its own vEthernet address: 172.19.192.1
  • use host.docker.internal. Most answers have this or another form of it depending on OS. The name suggests it is now globally used by docker.

A third option is to use WAN address of the machine, or in other words IP given by the service provider. However, this may not work if IP is not static, and requires routing and firewall settings.

Yılmaz Durmaz
  • 2,374
  • 12
  • 26
  • This is huge for wsl users. `host.docker.internal` is usually the answer....but if you're using wsl, there will be multiple ip addresses that docker will have to disambiguate from. This can lead to SUPER annoying issues where you have a multiple servers running locally on different ports, but you can only hit a couple with `host.docker.internal`. – A. Chang Apr 15 '22 at 19:17
6

You need to know the gateway! My solution with local server was to expose it under 0.0.0.0:8000, then run docker with subnet and run container like:

docker network create --subnet=172.35.0.0/16 --gateway 172.35.0.1 SUBNET35
docker run -d -p 4444:4444 --net SUBNET35 <container-you-want-run-place-here>

So, now you can access your loopback through http://172.35.0.1:8000

storenth
  • 967
  • 11
  • 18
5

Connect to the gateway address.

❯ docker network inspect bridge | grep Gateway
                    "Gateway": "172.17.0.1"

Make sure the process on the host is listening on this interface or on all interfaces and is started after docker. If using systemd, you can add the below to make sure it is started after docker.

[Unit]
After=docker.service

Example

❯ python -m http.server &> /dev/null &
[1] 149976

❯ docker run --rm python python -c  "from urllib.request import urlopen;print(b'Directory listing for' in urlopen('http://172.17.0.1:8000').read())" 
True
balki
  • 26,394
  • 30
  • 105
  • 151
4

Here is my solution : it works for my case

  • set local mysql server to public access by comment #bind-address = 127.0.0.1 in /etc/mysql/mysql.conf.d

  • restart mysql server sudo /etc/init.d/mysql restart

  • run the following command to open user root access any host mysql -uroot -proot GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON *.* TO 'root'@'%' IDENTIFIED BY 'root' WITH GRANT OPTION; FLUSH PRIVILEGES;

  • create sh script : run_docker.sh

    #!bin/bash

    HOSTIP=`ip -4 addr show scope global dev eth0 | grep inet | awk '{print \$2}' | cut -d / -f 1`


      docker run -it -d --name web-app \
                  --add-host=local:${HOSTIP} \
                  -p 8080:8080 \
                  -e DATABASE_HOST=${HOSTIP} \
                  -e DATABASE_PORT=3306 \
                  -e DATABASE_NAME=demo \
                  -e DATABASE_USER=root \
                  -e DATABASE_PASSWORD=root \
                  sopheamak/springboot_docker_mysql

  
  • run with docker-composer

    version: '2.1'
    
    

    services:
    tomcatwar: extra_hosts: - "local:10.1.2.232" image: sopheamak/springboot_docker_mysql
    ports: - 8080:8080 environment: - DATABASE_HOST=local - DATABASE_USER=root - DATABASE_PASSWORD=root - DATABASE_NAME=demo - DATABASE_PORT=3306

sopheamak
  • 393
  • 3
  • 12
3

You can get the host ip using alpine image

docker run --rm alpine ip route | awk 'NR==1 {print $3}'

This would be more consistent as you're always using alpine to run the command.

Similar to Mariano's answer you can use same command to set an environment variable

DOCKER_HOST=$(docker run --rm alpine ip route | awk 'NR==1 {print $3}') docker-compose up
hasnat
  • 2,647
  • 1
  • 20
  • 23
3

You can simply do ifconfig on host machine to check your host IP, then connect to the ip from within your container, works perfectly for me.

Duc Trung Mai
  • 2,141
  • 1
  • 24
  • 23
2

The CGroups and Namespaces are playing major role in the Container Ecosystem.

Namespace provide a layer of isolation. Each container runs in a separate namespace and its access is limited to that namespace. The Cgroups controls the resource utilization of each container, whereas Namespace controls what a process can see and access the respective resource.

Here is the basic understanding of the solution approach you could follow,

Use Network Namespace

When a container spawns out of image, a network interface is defined and create. This gives the container unique IP address and interface.

$ docker run -it alpine ifconfig

By changing the namespace to host, cotainers networks does not remain isolated to its interface, the process will have access to host machines network interface.

$ docker run -it --net=host alpine ifconfig

If the process listens on ports, they'll be listened on the host interface and mapped to the container.

Use PID Namespace By changing the Pid namespace allows a container to interact with other process beyond its normal scope.

This container will run in its own namespace.

$ docker run -it alpine ps aux

By changing the namespace to the host, the container can also see all the other processes running on the system.

$ docker run -it --pid=host alpine ps aux

Sharing Namespace

This is a bad practice to do this in production because you are breaking out of the container security model which might open up for vulnerabilities, and easy access to eavesdropper. This is only for debugging tools and understating the loopholes in container security.

The first container is nginx server. This will create a new network and process namespace. This container will bind itself to port 80 of newly created network interface.

$ docker run -d --name http nginx:alpine

Another container can now reuse this namespace,

$ docker run --net=container:http mohan08p/curl curl -s localhost

Also, this container can see the interface with the processes in a shared container.

$ docker run --pid=container:http alpine ps aux

This will allow you give more privileges to containers without changing or restarting the application. In the similar way you can connect to mysql on host, run and debug your application. But, its not recommend to go by this way. Hope it helps.

mohan08p
  • 5,002
  • 1
  • 28
  • 36
2

Until fix is not merged into master branch, to get host IP just run from inside of the container:

ip -4 route list match 0/0 | cut -d' ' -f3

(as suggested by @Mahoney here).

patryk.beza
  • 4,876
  • 5
  • 37
  • 56
2

I solved it by creating a user in MySQL for the container's ip:

$ sudo mysql<br>
mysql> create user 'username'@'172.17.0.2' identified by 'password';<br>
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

mysql> grant all privileges on database_name.* to 'username'@'172.17.0.2' with grant option;<br>
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

$ sudo vim /etc/mysql/mysql.conf.d/mysqld.cnf
<br>bind-address        = 172.17.0.1

$ sudo systemctl restart mysql.service

Then on container: jdbc:mysql://<b>172.17.0.1</b>:3306/database_name

Philzen
  • 3,945
  • 30
  • 46
Leandro
  • 376
  • 5
  • 16
2

To make everything work, you need to create a config for your server (caddy, nginx) where the main domain will be "docker.for.mac.localhost". For this replace in baseURL "http://localhost/api" on "http://docker.for.mac.localhost/api"

docker-compose.yml

backend:
  restart: always
  image: backend
  build:
    dockerfile: backend.Dockerfile
    context: .
  environment:
    # add django setting.py os.getenv("var") to bd config and ALLOWED_HOSTS CORS_ORIGIN_WHITELIST
    DJANGO_ALLOWED_PROTOCOL: http
    DJANGO_ALLOWED_HOSTS: docker.for.mac.localhost
    POSTGRES_PASSWORD: 123456
    POSTGRES_USER: user
    POSTGRES_DB: bd_name
    WAITDB: "1"
  volumes:
    - backend_static:/app/static
    - backend_media:/app/media
  depends_on:
    - db

frontend:
  restart: always
  build:
    dockerfile: frontend.Dockerfile
    context: .
  image: frontend
  environment:
    #  replace baseURL for axios
    API_URL: http://docker.for.mac.localhost/b/api
    API_URL_BROWSER: http://docker.for.mac.localhost/b/api
    NUXT_HOST: 0.0.0.0
  depends_on:
    - backend

caddy:
  image: abiosoft/caddy
  restart: always
  volumes:
    - $HOME/.caddy:/root/.caddy
    - ./Caddyfile.local:/etc/Caddyfile
    - backend_static:/static
    - backend_media:/media
  ports:
  - 80:80
  depends_on:
    - frontend
    - backend
    - db

Caddyfile.local

http://docker.for.mac.localhost {

  proxy /b backend:5000 {
    header_upstream Host {host}
    header_upstream X-Real-IP {remote}
    header_upstream X-Forwarded-For {remote}
    header_upstream X-Forwarded-Port {server_port}
    header_upstream X-Forwarded-Proto {scheme}
  }

  proxy / frontend:3000 {
    header_upstream Host {host}
    header_upstream X-Real-IP {remote}
    header_upstream X-Forwarded-For {remote}
    header_upstream X-Forwarded-Port {server_port}
    header_upstream X-Forwarded-Proto {scheme}
  }

  root /

  log stdout
  errors stdout
  gzip
}

http://docker.for.mac.localhost/static {
  root /static
}

http://docker.for.mac.localhost/media {
  root /media
}

django settings.py

ALLOWED_HOSTS = [os.getenv("DJANGO_ALLOWED_HOSTS")]
    
CORS_ORIGIN_WHITELIST = [f'{os.getenv("DJANGO_ALLOWED_PROTOCOL")}://{os.getenv("DJANGO_ALLOWED_HOSTS")}']

DATABASES = {
    "default": {
        "ENGINE": "django.db.backends.postgresql_psycopg2",
        "NAME": os.getenv("POSTGRES_DB"),
        "USER": os.getenv("POSTGRES_USER"),
        "PASSWORD": os.getenv("POSTGRES_PASSWORD"),
        "HOST": "db",
        "PORT": "5432",
    }
}

nuxt.config.js (the baseURL variable will override API_URL of environment)

axios: {
  baseURL: 'http://127.0.0.1:8000/b/api'
},
wiseCoder
  • 21
  • 1
2

you can use net alias for your machine

OSX

sudo ifconfig lo0 alias 123.123.123.123/24 up

LINUX

sudo ifconfig lo:0  123.123.123.123 up

then from the container you can see the machine by 123.123.123.123

Adán Escobar
  • 1,729
  • 9
  • 15
2

Unfortunately, currently, Windows (at least docker desktop) is not supporting --net=host

Quoted from: https://docs.docker.com/network/network-tutorial-host/#prerequisites

The host networking driver only works on Linux hosts, and is not supported on Docker for Mac, Docker for Windows, or Docker EE for Windows Server.

You can try to use https://docs.docker.com/toolbox/

Nigrimmist
  • 10,289
  • 4
  • 52
  • 53
2

An additional point might be useful, especially for NGINX server configuration within a docker container. So, if your host service is supposed to read a client's url for different purposes, there is a possibility to define it, just slightly modifying the approach mentioned before in the answers:

--add-host brand-A-client.local:host-gateway

or in a docker-compose.yml

extra_hosts:
- brand-B-client.local:host-gateway

And refer to them respectively within containers. Applicable for Docker Windows/Macos/Linux.

Maksym Kosenko
  • 515
  • 7
  • 12
1

if you use docker-compose, maybe it can work:

iptables -I INPUT ! -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 8001 -j ACCEPT

the eth0 is your network interface that connect internet, and 8081 the host server port

the best way for iptables rule is iptables TRACE

L.T
  • 2,539
  • 3
  • 20
  • 30
1

the server on the host is listening on port 5000; it will send a string response from host back as a response

echo "response from host" | nc -l -p 5000

the docker is running in bridge mode by default (that is more secure than running in host network mode); the process in the docker gets the ipv4 address for the first network interface on the host that is not 127.0.0.1; this ipv4 address is passed to the docker via environment variable HOSTIP ; inside the docker there is a nc command that connects to the server on the host ip and port 5000; the command also reads the response of the server.

HOST=$(ifconfig | grep 'inet ' | grep -v 127.0.0.1 | awk '{ print $2 }' | head -1 | sed -n 's/[^0-9]*\([0-9\.]*\)/\1/p'); docker run -e HOSTIP="${HOST}" --rm -it alpine /bin/sh -c 'echo "greetings from container" | nc $HOSTIP 5000 -v'

The expression that computes the ipv4 address of the first listed interface does work on osx and linux:

HOST=$(ifconfig | grep 'inet ' | grep -v 127.0.0.1 | awk '{ print $2 }' | head -1 | sed -n 's/[^0-9]*\([0-9\.]*\)/\1/p')

to make it even more general: you can run the server inside another docker container, that would look as follows:

docker run --expose 5000 -p :5000:5000 --rm -it alpine /bin/sh -c 'echo "response from host" | nc -l -p 5000'

--expose 5000 the docker container can accept connection on port 5000

-p :5000:5000 the docker engine on the host side is listening on port 5000 on any interface and is forwarding connections to port 5000 on the container network (where nc is running).

MichaelMoser
  • 3,172
  • 1
  • 26
  • 26
1

Despite lot of long, confusing answers a short one. If your docker bridge network is 172.17.0.0/16, do the following things:

  1. Bind your container to 172.17.0.1 eg. -p 172.17.0.1:8080:8080 (whatever is the gateway in your Docker bridge network)
  2. Just access 172.17.0.1 port 8080 eg. curl http://172.17.0.1:8080/ from other container
Tires
  • 1,529
  • 16
  • 27
1

For me enetring this command on the host to get the ip did the trick:

docker run busybox ping -c 1 host.docker.internal | awk 'FNR==2 {print $4}' | sed s'/.$//'

or on mac

docker run busybox ping -c 1 docker.for.mac.localhost | awk 'FNR==2 {print $4}' | sed s'/.$//'

docker-compose.yml

version: '3.8'

services:
  spring-app-container:
    image: spring-app:1
    build:
      context: ./
      dockerfile: Dockerfile
    ports:
      - "50800:50800"
midi
  • 3,128
  • 5
  • 30
  • 47
0

For Windows Machine :-

Run the below command to Expose docker port randomly during build time

$docker run -d --name MyWebServer -P mediawiki

enter image description here

enter image description here

In the above container list you can see the port assigned as 32768. Try accessing

localhost:32768 

You can see the mediawiki page

Lokesh S
  • 426
  • 4
  • 13
  • 10
    Though this answer may provide useful information to some users, it is _the wrong way around_! It is about accessing a service _running in the container_ from the host machine. The question, however, was about accessing a service _running on the host_ from the container. – einjohn May 09 '19 at 13:24
0

The way I do it is pass the host IP as environment variable to container. Container then access the host by that variable.

F. Kam
  • 626
  • 5
  • 9
  • Can you illustrate how you do this? I had attempted this approach but didn't find much success – kmjb Feb 17 '20 at 14:11
  • ` docker run -i -t -e HOST=10.145.2.123 ubuntu root@ce2a843da3ee:/tmp# ./telnet $HOST 22 Trying 10.145.2.123... Connected to 10.145.2.123. Escape character is '^]'. SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.4` – F. Kam Feb 20 '20 at 08:29
0

On Windows machines, it is common that ports are unreachable because of internal cache problems with network addresses translator. Restarting it might help:

net stop winnat
net start winnat
Danon
  • 2,771
  • 27
  • 37
0

If it's useful to anyone, when using NEXTJS on mac I had to use http://docker.for.mac.localhost:8000 on the CLIENT and plain old http://localhost:8000 on the server.

Tony Jara
  • 69
  • 2